#Iridient n transformer software

#Iridient n transformer software

As far as I can tell, what I'm seeing cannot be defeated by effort, by choice of processing software or any other means. I find that it can often rob an image of naturalness or that highly desirable (if not coveted) life-like quality. While this combination of sharpness and softness (or 'roundness' if you will) is akin to film imaging, I'm afraid that the Fuji X-Trans sensor goes a little beyond just attempting to provide a film-like appearance. The only other cameras I've known to exhibit the same dichotomy of characteristics are the Sigma/Foveons, up to and including their latest mirrorless models. I know this sounds strange and contradictory, but that's the best way I can explain my observation. The 'look' of images shot via X-Trans is always there.Īs best as I can describe it and have experienced it, the 'look' is an intrusive softening or smoothing of very fine detail that resides side-by-side with an obvious crispness or sharpness that's very appealing. whether one is shooting RAW, JPEG, color, black and white, large file or small, high ISO or low. By that I mean the design has a built-in character or 'look' that seems to override all other aspects of the imaging. I've concluded that its bottom-line value as a unique sensor design is both admirable and questionable. It's really excellent.)Īfter shooting several thousand images across a wide range of environments and conditions, I find myself conflicted about the sensor. (The zoom is far better than I ever imagined a 'slow' zoom could be. I've since purchased the 50-230 zoom and a 35mm prime. In mid-2017 I decided to get my feet wet in the X-Trans pool and purchased an X-E2 and 18-55 kit. Mixed feelings about the X-Trans sensor.